Clinical evaluation and specialist annotation for healthcare AI.

We help healthcare AI teams evaluate model behaviour and build reliable clinical datasets. Specialty-matched clinicians work alongside PhD data scientists and AI engineers, from programme design through delivery.

Programmes can be designed and delivered in your environment where appropriate, or alongside your existing team.

BiteLabs

Access to a network of 30,000+ clinicians through BiteLabs.

Clinical modalities

  • Medical imaging
  • Clinical text, EHR & NLP
  • Audio
  • Video
  • Other clinical media on request

Powered by BiteLabs

30,000+ clinicians. One specialist network.

BiteLabs

DeepLabel draws on the BiteLabs network of more than 30,000 clinicians to build project teams around specialty, geography, credentials and availability.

Selection, matching, calibration and quality controls are defined for each programme.

Explore the BiteLabs network

Clinical expertise, built into the workflow

The difficult cases need more than a generic label.

Whether you are assessing a model’s clinical reasoning, building a reference standard or preparing data for the next training cycle, the work depends on the right specialists, clear criteria and a workflow that captures disagreement rather than concealing it. We design and run that work with your team.

How we work

From an early question to a working programme.

  1. 01

    Programme design

    Clarify the clinical task, data, evaluation criteria, platform and outputs.

  2. 02

    Specialist delivery

    Assemble and coordinate clinicians matched to the specialty, geography and required credentials; work in your environment where appropriate.

  3. 03

    Quality and insight

    Calibrate reviewers, manage QA and disagreement, and return usable findings for model development or validation.

  4. 04

    Embedded support

    Work alongside your team where you need clinical, data science or AI engineering capacity.

Types of work

Work designed for the clinical question at hand.

  • Clinical review of model outputs and severity-based failure analysis

  • Evaluation frameworks, scoring rubrics and benchmark protocols

  • Specialist reference-standard annotation and provenance

  • Preference datasets and clinical red-teaming

Project brief

Tell us what you need to evaluate or build.

Share the clinical use case, modality, approximate volume and where you are in development. We will suggest a practical approach.